Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 29, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f... Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o...
Both RPC Fast and Hyperstack hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
RPC Fast uses a paid model — https://rpcfast.com/pricing, while Hyperstack is freemium.
RPC Fast offers 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. Hyperstack counters with 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RPC Fast currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hyperstack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RPC Fast's key strengths include built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. Hyperstack stands out for schema-first workflow collapses backend and frontend data plumbing, generated react hooks speed the path from data to live ui, keeps on-chain backend and frontend in sync without glue code. On the flip side, RPC Fast's weaknesses include specialized for advanced builders, not general devs, while Hyperstack's main drawback is hackathon-recognized infrastructure is typically early-stage.
More comparisons
Compare RPC Fast with…
Compare Hyperstack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 3 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 447 | 15,745 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out |
While RPC Fast (RPC Providers) and Hyperstack (Developer Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check RPC Fast's pricing and Hyperstack is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.