Head-to-head · Comparison
RugCheck vs ICM Analytics
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
RugCheck
- Completely free and essential tool for Solana token due diligence
- Quick visual risk scores make safety assessment instant
- Detailed explanations educate users about specific risk factors
- Widely integrated into trading bots and terminals across the ecosystem
- Regularly updated to detect new exploit patterns and scam vectors
- Cannot detect all scam types — social engineering and slow rugs may pass
- Risk scores can give false sense of security if used as sole analysis tool
- New exploit patterns may not be detected until analysis is updated
- Does not analyze team credibility or project fundamentals
ICM Analytics
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
RugCheck RugCheck is an essential security tool for Solana traders that analyzes token contracts to identify potential risks, scam indicators, and red flags before trading. In an ecosystem where thousands of n... ICM Analytics ICM Analytics is a fundamentals-focused crypto analytics platform positioning itself as the intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets. Instead of hype-based trading, it tracks fundamental and ad...
Community Ratings
ICM Analytics is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.3/5 for RugCheck (3 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
RugCheck uses a free model — Free to use. API available for developers and integrators., while ICM Analytics is freemium. RugCheck has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though ICM Analytics's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
RugCheck offers 8 features including Automated token contract analysis for common exploit vectors, Mint authority and freeze authority detection, Top holder concentration analysis to identify whale-controlled tokens, and 5 more. ICM Analytics counters with 6 features including Fundamental token metrics: revenue, P/E-style ratios, DAU, app-store ratings, holder counts, Live dashboards with holder tracking, limit-order and DCA monitoring, AI Feed tracking calls from monitored AI agents, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RugCheck currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. ICM Analytics is rated healthy with 90.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
RugCheck's key strengths include completely free and essential tool for solana token due diligence, quick visual risk scores make safety assessment instant, detailed explanations educate users about specific risk factors.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare RugCheck with…
Compare ICM Analytics with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.