Head-to-head · Comparison
RugCheck vs Streamflow
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 28, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
RugCheck
- Completely free and essential tool for Solana token due diligence
- Quick visual risk scores make safety assessment instant
- Detailed explanations educate users about specific risk factors
- Widely integrated into trading bots and terminals across the ecosystem
- Regularly updated to detect new exploit patterns and scam vectors
- Cannot detect all scam types — social engineering and slow rugs may pass
- Risk scores can give false sense of security if used as sole analysis tool
- New exploit patterns may not be detected until analysis is updated
- Does not analyze team credibility or project fundamentals
Streamflow
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
RugCheck RugCheck is an essential security tool for Solana traders that analyzes token contracts to identify potential risks, scam indicators, and red flags before trading. In an ecosystem where thousands of n... Streamflow Streamflow is a token vesting, payroll streaming, and batch payment platform on Solana that enables organizations to automate token distributions to employees, investors, and community members. It pro...
Community Ratings
Streamflow is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.5/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.3/5 for RugCheck (3 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
RugCheck uses a free model — Free to use. API available for developers and integrators., while Streamflow is freemium — Free to create basic streams. Premium features and larger contracts have small platform fees. Enterprise pricing available.. RugCheck has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Streamflow's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
RugCheck offers 8 features including Automated token contract analysis for common exploit vectors, Mint authority and freeze authority detection, Top holder concentration analysis to identify whale-controlled tokens, and 5 more. Streamflow counters with 8 features including Token streaming with continuous real-time payment flows, Cliff vesting with configurable initial lock-up periods, Batch payments for sending tokens to hundreds of recipients, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RugCheck currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Streamflow is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
RugCheck's key strengths include completely free and essential tool for solana token due diligence, quick visual risk scores make safety assessment instant, detailed explanations educate users about specific risk factors.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare RugCheck with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.