Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 7, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre... Archer Exchange Archer is a fully on-chain central limit orderbook (CLOB) spot exchange on Solana. Instead of continuous matching, it settles trades in discrete dual-flow batch auctions — shielding market makers from...
Both Salmon and Archer Exchange hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Salmon uses a free model, while Archer Exchange is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Salmon offers 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. Archer Exchange counters with 6 features including Fully on-chain central limit orderbook (no off-chain matching), Dual-flow batch-auction settlement, Sandwich / MEV protection by design, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Archer Exchange is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. Archer Exchange stands out for on-chain orderbook removes off-chain matching trust, batch auctions blunt sandwich/mev on every trade, maker protection from toxic flow attracts real liquidity.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare Archer Exchange with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,311 | 2,242 |
| Categories | Wallets | DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | Fully on-chain orderbook DEX with MEV-protected batch auctions |
While Salmon (Wallets) and Archer Exchange (DEXs & Swaps) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and Archer Exchange is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.