Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 29, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre... Envio Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform that turns on-chain events into queryable APIs, with native support for Solana alongside EVM-compatible chains and Fuel. Its pitch is fast, multichain inde...
Salmon is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Envio (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Salmon uses a free model, while Envio is freemium. Salmon has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Envio's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Salmon offers 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. Envio counters with 5 features including TypeScript event handlers with auto-generated GraphQL APIs, HyperSync high-throughput data retrieval layer, HyperRPC read-only JSON-RPC endpoint, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Envio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. Envio stands out for native solana plus broad evm and fuel chain support, fast historical backfill and low-latency live indexing, flexible self-host or managed-cloud deployment options.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare Envio with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,314 | 4,223 |
| Categories | Wallets | API Platforms, Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | Ultrafast blockchain data indexer for Solana and EVM chains |
While Salmon (Wallets) and Envio (API Platforms) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Salmon has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and Envio is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.