Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre... ICM Analytics ICM Analytics is a fundamentals-focused crypto analytics platform positioning itself as the intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets. Instead of hype-based trading, it tracks fundamental and ad...
Both Salmon and ICM Analytics hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Salmon uses a free model, while ICM Analytics is freemium. Salmon has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though ICM Analytics's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Salmon offers 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. ICM Analytics counters with 6 features including Fundamental token metrics: revenue, P/E-style ratios, DAU, app-store ratings, holder counts, Live dashboards with holder tracking, limit-order and DCA monitoring, AI Feed tracking calls from monitored AI agents, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. ICM Analytics is rated healthy with 90.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. ICM Analytics stands out for fundamentals-and-adoption angle is differentiated from typical chart/price-only tools, aggregates on-chain, social, and web2 adoption data (app ratings, dau) in one place, free entry tier lowers the barrier to evaluate the data.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare ICM Analytics with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,314 | 191 |
| Categories | Wallets | Data & Indexing, AI Agents, Analytics & Charts |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | The fundamentals intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets |
While Salmon (Wallets) and ICM Analytics (Data & Indexing) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and ICM Analytics is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.