Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 21, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Bloom Bloom is an AI-powered Solana trading bot that uses machine learning to assist traders with token analysis, trade execution, and portfolio management. It represents the newer generation of trading too...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Bloom (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Bloom is freemium. Sanctum has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Bloom's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Bloom counters with 8 features including AI-powered token analysis with risk assessment and sentiment detection, Telegram-based trading with quick swap execution, Machine learning-assisted trade recommendations, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Bloom is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 4 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,120 | 24,699 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Trading Bots |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | AI-powered Solana trading bot with smart execution |
While Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) and Bloom (Trading Bots) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Bloom is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.