Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 21, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Fragmetric Fragmetric is Solana's first and largest native liquid restaking protocol, launched in October 2024, with over $300 million in Total Value Locked and 80,000+ active participants. The protocol allows u...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Fragmetric (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Fragmetric is free — No platform fees. Standard network transaction fees apply.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Fragmetric counters with 7 features including Liquid restaking with fragSOL and fragJTO tokens, Accepts SOL and multiple LSTs as deposits, Additional NCN rewards on top of staking yields, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Fragmetric is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Fragmetric with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 80,983 | 48,697 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Liquid Staking |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Solana's leading liquid restaking protocol with $300M+ TVL |
Both Sanctum and Fragmetric operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Fragmetric is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.