Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 29, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o...
Both Sanctum and Hyperstack hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Hyperstack is freemium. Sanctum has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Hyperstack's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Hyperstack counters with 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hyperstack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Hyperstack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,071 | 15,745 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out |
While Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) and Hyperstack (Developer Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Hyperstack is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.