Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... OtterSec OtterSec is one of the most respected security auditing firms in the Solana ecosystem, having audited critical infrastructure including Wormhole, Solana Program Library, Marinade, and dozens of top De...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for OtterSec (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while OtterSec is paid. Sanctum has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though OtterSec's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. OtterSec counters with 5 features including Comprehensive Solana smart contract and program audits, Deep expertise in Rust, Anchor, and native Solana programs, Post-audit monitoring and incident response support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. OtterSec is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare OtterSec with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,124 | 21,039 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Security & Audit |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Premier Solana smart contract security auditor trusted by top protocols |
While Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) and OtterSec (Security & Audit) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and check OtterSec's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.