Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Solana Compass Solana Compass is a comprehensive staking analytics platform that helps SOL holders find the best validators and optimize their staking returns. The tool aggregates data from all active Solana validat...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Solana Compass (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Solana Compass is free — Free to use. Revenue from validator partnerships and premium data access.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Solana Compass counters with 7 features including Validator comparison with performance scores and APY estimates, Historical validator data including epoch-by-epoch performance, Commission rate tracking and change history for every validator, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Solana Compass is rated healthy with 92.7% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Solana Compass with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,071 | 7,302 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Staking |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Validator analytics and staking comparison tool for Solana |
Both Sanctum and Solana Compass operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Solana Compass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.