Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 2, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f... Envio Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform that turns on-chain events into queryable APIs, with native support for Solana alongside EVM-compatible chains and Fuel. Its pitch is fast, multichain inde...
Both Sandglass and Envio hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Sandglass uses a free model, while Envio is freemium. Sandglass has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Envio's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Sandglass offers 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. Envio counters with 5 features including TypeScript event handlers with auto-generated GraphQL APIs, HyperSync high-throughput data retrieval layer, HyperRPC read-only JSON-RPC endpoint, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sandglass currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Envio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sandglass's key strengths include brings pendle-style yield tokenization natively to solana, enables predictable fixed-rate returns through pt, supports both lst and lending yields as sources. Envio stands out for native solana plus broad evm and fuel chain support, fast historical backfill and low-latency live indexing, flexible self-host or managed-cloud deployment options.
More comparisons
Compare Sandglass with…
Compare Envio with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,292 | 4,223 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | API Platforms, Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies | Ultrafast blockchain data indexer for Solana and EVM chains |
While Sandglass (DeFi & Yield) and Envio (API Platforms) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Sandglass is free to start and Envio is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.