Head-to-head · Comparison
Streamflow vs Archer Exchange
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
Streamflow
- Essential tool for any Solana project managing team or investor token vesting
- Real-time streaming provides continuous compensation without manual distribution
- Batch payments dramatically simplify large-scale token distributions
- Multisig integration adds security for organizational payment flows
- Clean interface makes complex vesting schedules easy to set up and manage
- Small fee on stream creation adds cost for frequent payment setups
- Token streaming model may not suit all compensation structures
- Recipients must actively claim tokens or enable auto-claim
- Less useful for simple one-time transfers that don't need vesting
Archer Exchange
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
Streamflow Streamflow is a token vesting, payroll streaming, and batch payment platform on Solana that enables organizations to automate token distributions to employees, investors, and community members. It pro... Archer Exchange Archer is a fully on-chain central limit orderbook (CLOB) spot exchange on Solana. Instead of continuous matching, it settles trades in discrete dual-flow batch auctions — shielding market makers from...
Community Ratings
Streamflow is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.5/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Archer Exchange (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
Streamflow uses a freemium model — Free to create basic streams. Premium features and larger contracts have small platform fees. Enterprise pricing available., while Archer Exchange is free. Archer Exchange has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Streamflow's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Key Features
Streamflow offers 8 features including Token streaming with continuous real-time payment flows, Cliff vesting with configurable initial lock-up periods, Batch payments for sending tokens to hundreds of recipients, and 5 more. Archer Exchange counters with 6 features including Fully on-chain central limit orderbook (no off-chain matching), Dual-flow batch-auction settlement, Sandwich / MEV protection by design, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Streamflow currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Archer Exchange is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Streamflow's key strengths include essential tool for any solana project managing team or investor token vesting, real-time streaming provides continuous compensation without manual distribution, batch payments dramatically simplify large-scale token distributions.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare Streamflow with…
Compare Archer Exchange with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.