Head-to-head · Comparison
Streamflow vs Polymarket
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
Streamflow
- Essential tool for any Solana project managing team or investor token vesting
- Real-time streaming provides continuous compensation without manual distribution
- Batch payments dramatically simplify large-scale token distributions
- Multisig integration adds security for organizational payment flows
- Clean interface makes complex vesting schedules easy to set up and manage
- Small fee on stream creation adds cost for frequent payment setups
- Token streaming model may not suit all compensation structures
- Recipients must actively claim tokens or enable auto-claim
- Less useful for simple one-time transfers that don't need vesting
Polymarket
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
Streamflow Streamflow is a token vesting, payroll streaming, and batch payment platform on Solana that enables organizations to automate token distributions to employees, investors, and community members. It pro... Polymarket Polymarket is the world's largest prediction market platform, where users trade on the outcomes of real-world events spanning politics, sports, crypto, and culture. Each market lets participants buy a...
Community Ratings
Streamflow is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.5/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Polymarket (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
Streamflow uses a freemium model — Free to create basic streams. Premium features and larger contracts have small platform fees. Enterprise pricing available., while Polymarket is free. Polymarket has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Streamflow's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Key Features
Streamflow offers 8 features including Token streaming with continuous real-time payment flows, Cliff vesting with configurable initial lock-up periods, Batch payments for sending tokens to hundreds of recipients, and 5 more. Polymarket counters with 5 features including Tradable markets on politics, sports, crypto, and culture, Solana access via Jupiter integration for low-fee trading, USDC settlement for stable-denominated outcomes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Streamflow currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Polymarket is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Streamflow's key strengths include essential tool for any solana project managing team or investor token vesting, real-time streaming provides continuous compensation without manual distribution, batch payments dramatically simplify large-scale token distributions.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare Streamflow with…
Compare Polymarket with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.