Head-to-head · Prediction Markets
VOICE vs Fors
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 22, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Unknown | Unknown |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
VOICE
- Novel no-loss model lowers risk versus traditional prediction markets
- Rewards both content creators and participants
- Rewards minority opinions, not just consensus
- Fast, low-cost interactions on Solana
- Very new sub-sector (OpinionFi) with unproven long-term sustainability
- Rewards are denominated in a volatile native $VOICE token
- Reward-pool model depends on continued participation and inflows
Fors
- Unifies fragmented prediction-market liquidity in one interface
- Non-custodial — users retain control of their funds
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
VOICE VOICE is a SocialFi platform on Solana pioneering 'OpinionFi' — a model that treats human opinions as high-signal, monetizable data. Users create and participate in polls and debates, allocating $VOIC... Fors Fors is a Solana-native prediction-market aggregator that consolidates fragmented betting and forecasting venues into a single non-custodial interface. Instead of juggling separate accounts across Pol...
Community Ratings
Both VOICE and Fors hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
VOICE uses a free model, while Fors is freemium. VOICE has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Fors's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
VOICE offers 5 features including Create and participate in opinion polls and debates, 'Anti-loss' staking — earn rewards without risking principal, Daily reward pool split 50/50 between poll creators and voters, and 2 more. Fors counters with 5 features including Smart Order Routing across multiple prediction-market venues, Cross-venue arbitrage and mispricing detection, Real-time copy trading of profitable forecasters, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. VOICE currently has a unknown health status. Fors is rated unknown. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
VOICE's key strengths include novel no-loss model lowers risk versus traditional prediction markets, rewards both content creators and participants, rewards minority opinions, not just consensus. Fors stands out for unifies fragmented prediction-market liquidity in one interface, non-custodial — users retain control of their funds, surfaces arbitrage and smart-money positioning across venues.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.