Bloom and Trojan are both Telegram-first Solana trading bots with no subscription and a 1% fee. But their strategies are completely different. Here's which one fits your trading style.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, MadeOnSol may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our rankings, ratings, or reviews.
Both bots charge 1% per swap. Here is what that looks like in practice:
Trojan effective fee: current docs publish 1% gross with 20% cashback, roughly 0.8% effective when cashback applies. Referral earnings are separate from your own trading-fee rate.
Bloom effective fee: 0.9% with a referral code. The 10% cashback applies to your own trading fees, not referral volume. Simpler to calculate, slightly higher floor.
At $10,000 in monthly volume, a simple illustration is about $80 effective for Trojan if the documented 20% cashback applies versus $90 for Bloom when using Bloom's 0.9% referral rate. Execution costs and eligibility can change the real total.
Both bots call it copy trading. The experience is different.
Trojan copy trading is built for portfolio management. You set rules per wallet you follow — how much to copy, daily loss limits, whether to copy sells, which token types to exclude. You can run 5+ wallets simultaneously with independent rules. It mirrors how professional copy traders actually think.
Bloom copy trading is more basic — follow a wallet, copy a percentage of their buys. Less configuration, faster to set up. Fine for simple single-wallet following, not built for multi-target managed copying.
If copy trading is your primary strategy, Trojan is the better tool. If it is one of several features you use occasionally, Bloom is adequate.
Whichever bot you pick, the tool only matters if the strategy behind it is sound. If you are still figuring out your approach, start with our rundown of Solana trading strategies for beginners and let that shape how you configure these bots.
Tools mentioned
Live health scores, average ratings, and direct links on MadeOnSol.
Get this data via API
Stream real-time KOL trades, PnL rankings, and coordination signals programmatically.
import { MadeOnSol } from "madeonsol";
const client = new MadeOnSol({ apiKey: "msk_your_key" });
// Real-time KOL trades
const { trades } = await client.kol.feed({ limit: 10, action: "buy" });
// KOL convergence signals
const { tokens } = await client.kol.coordination({ min_kols: 3 });Keep reading
Comparisons
Bloom and BullX are two of the most popular Solana trading bots in 2026 — but they are built for completely different traders. Here's how to pick the right one.
Comparisons
Banana Gun trades five chains from one Telegram session; Trojan is Solana-native and built for speed. Which trading bot fits your style? An honest 2026 comparison.
Comparisons
BonkBot and Trojan are both Telegram-native Solana trading bots with a ~1% fee, but they're built for different traders. BonkBot keeps it simple and feeds its fees back into BONK buybacks; Trojan piles on copy trading, DCA, and a cashback rewards layer. Here's how they actually compare.
Reviews
Mizar bundles copy trading, DCA, and automated take-profit/stop-loss into one pay-per-trade platform across Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BNB Chain. Here's what it costs, what it does well, and why it's not a Solana-exclusive tool.
Comparisons
Padre and Axiom are the two terminals serious memecoin traders argue about in 2026 — though pump.fun acquired Padre and renamed it Terminal in October 2025. Axiom wins on fees at volume, perps, and cashback. Padre wins on multi-chain order types, mobile parity, and wallet flow. Here's the honest, updated breakdown.
Guides
A practical guide to Padre, the non-custodial memecoin terminal. Wallet setup without the extension dance, the Trenches launch feed, real limit orders with trailing stops, copy trading, and trading the same account across 4 chains.
Enjoyed this article?
Real-time KOL trades, Pump.fun deployer intel, and 1,200+ ranked Solana & Robinhood Chain tools — free to explore.
Open the KOL TrackerBloom and Trojan both use percentage-based execution fees with no traditional subscription, the same primary interface (Telegram), and the same core market (Solana memecoins). They are the two most compared Telegram trading bots in the Solana space right now.
But they are built around very different edges. Trojan is the largest Solana Telegram bot by volume — $25B+ processed, 2 million users — built for copy traders, DCA strategies, and high-volume referral earners. Bloom is the faster, leaner bot built for traders who hunt alpha on Twitter before it trends.
This comparison covers what actually differs and which one is the right fit.
| Bloom | Trojan | |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | Telegram + browser extension | Telegram + web terminal |
| Fee | 1% (0.9% via Bloom referral, per current Bloom docs) | 1% gross with 20% cashback in current Trojan docs |
| Monthly fee | None | None |
| Twitter OCR sniping | ✓ | ✗ |
| DCA orders | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | Basic | Advanced (multi-filter) |
| AFK automation | ✓ (with dev filters) | ✗ |
| Browser extension | ✓ | ✗ |
| MEV protection | ✓ | ✓ (JITO-powered) |
| The Arena rewards | ✗ | ✓ |
| Referral tiers | 3 tiers (25% direct) | 5 tiers (35% direct) |
| Lifetime volume | $4.5B+ | $25B+ |
| Users | 70,000+ | 2,000,000+ |
Trojan is the dominant Solana Telegram trading bot by nearly every metric — volume, users, and feature depth. Its BOLT execution engine targets sub-2-second trade execution with backup bots kicking in during network congestion. BOLT Pro, available for wallets with 50+ SOL, targets near-zero failed transactions.
Copy trading is where Trojan separates itself. The filters go well beyond "copy X% of their buys." You can set max buy amount per transaction, toggle duplicate buys on or off, exclude PumpFun tokens, set minimum liquidity and thresholds, cap daily losses per trader, and run multiple copy targets simultaneously. For traders building a portfolio of copy positions rather than single-wallet copy, Trojan's system is meaningfully more sophisticated.
DCA is fully integrated — Bloom has none. If you want to build into a position over time or ladder out of one, Trojan handles it natively inside Telegram.
Trojan's current public pricing is simpler than the old Arena calculation: 1% gross with 20% cashback, or roughly 0.8% effective when cashback applies. Do not preserve the older ~0.72% Arena estimate as a current guaranteed rate.
The referral system is also deeper: 5 tiers with 35% on direct referrals, versus Bloom's 3 tiers at 25%. For traders building referral income as a side strategy, Trojan compounds better.
Where Trojan falls short: no Twitter sniping, no browser extension, and no AFK mode with developer quality filters. If the signal is on CT before it hits the charts, Trojan does not act on it automatically.
Bloom is the faster, more specialised bot. Its headline feature — Twitter OCR sniping — automatically reads token contract addresses from tweets, replies, and reposts, including addresses embedded in screenshots, and buys before the tweet spreads. No other major Solana bot does this.
AFK Mode lets you set automated buying rules based on developer quality filters — minimum SOL in dev wallets, previous launch success rate, migration history — and walk away. It is not as configurable as Trojan's copy trading, but it is the better tool for running an always-on memecoin sniper without watching a screen.
The browser extension is genuinely useful for traders who use multiple terminals. Bloom overlays fast buy/sell buttons on active terminals such as Axiom, GMGN and Photon. Older integrations referenced BullX too, but BullX trading is suspended and should not be treated as a current execution surface.
On effective fees: Bloom's referral cashback gives 10% back on your own fees. That is simpler but less powerful than Trojan's Arena + cashback combination for high-volume traders.
Where Bloom falls short: no DCA, and copy trading is more basic than Trojan. If you are running structured copy positions with daily loss limits and multi-trader diversification, Bloom is not the right tool.
Yes. They do not conflict. A common setup: Trojan for structured copy trades and DCA, Bloom for Twitter-triggered snipes and AFK automation. The Bloom browser extension works alongside Trojan's Telegram bot without interference.
Using the current published schedules, Trojan's 1% gross / 20% cashback is roughly 0.8% effective when cashback applies, while Bloom documents 0.9% via referral. Re-check both before high-volume use.
No. If DCA is important to your strategy, Trojan is the better choice.
Bloom targets sub-millisecond execution; Trojan's BOLT targets sub-2-seconds. Bloom has the edge on raw execution speed, though both are fast enough for most trades. The difference matters most during network congestion.
Trojan, clearly. Its copy trading system has more filters, multi-wallet support, and risk management tools. Bloom's copy trading is basic by comparison.
For traders who use CT as a signal source — yes, it is the only bot that does this automatically. For traders who do not track Twitter for token launches, it is irrelevant.
Both are non-custodial — your keys are encrypted on your device. Standard precautions apply: use dedicated trading wallets with only what you are willing to trade, never share seed phrases.
Bloom's official docs currently confirm a 1% buy/sell fee, reduced to 0.9% via referral, plus Solana/Ethereum/BSC/Base/Monad support. Trojan's current docs use a simpler 1% gross / 20% cashback model than the older Arena-effective-fee math previously repeated here. The feature comparison remains useful, but the current fee schedule should win over historical reward tiers.
Sources: Bloom fees and Trojan docs.