Bloom vs Trojan: Solana Trading Bot Comparison (2026)
Bloom and Trojan are both Telegram-first Solana trading bots with no subscription and a 1% fee. But their strategies are completely different. Here's which one fits your trading style.
MadeOnSol·· 7 min read
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, MadeOnSol may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our rankings, ratings, or reviews.
Fee Reality Check
Both bots charge 1% per swap. Here is what that looks like in practice:
Trojan effective fee: With The Arena cashback fully active, heavy traders can bring the fee down to approximately 0.72%. The 5-tier referral programme (35% on direct referrals) compounds this further for anyone with a referral audience.
Bloom effective fee: 0.9% with a referral code. The 10% cashback applies to your own trading fees, not referral volume. Simpler to calculate, slightly higher floor.
For traders doing $10,000/month in volume: Trojan at 0.72% = $72 in fees. Bloom at 0.9% = $90. The gap grows with volume.
Both bots call it copy trading. The experience is different.
Trojan copy trading is built for portfolio management. You set rules per wallet you follow — how much to copy, daily loss limits, whether to copy sells, which token types to exclude. You can run 5+ wallets simultaneously with independent rules. It mirrors how professional copy traders actually think.
Bloom copy trading is more basic — follow a wallet, copy a percentage of their buys. Less configuration, faster to set up. Fine for simple single-wallet following, not built for multi-target managed copying.
If copy trading is your primary strategy, Trojan is the better tool. If it is one of several features you use occasionally, Bloom is adequate.
Whichever bot you pick, the tool only matters if the strategy behind it is sound. If you are still figuring out your approach, start with our rundown of Solana trading strategies for beginners and let that shape how you configure these bots.
Who Should Choose Bloom
You monitor Twitter and CT for alpha before it hits the charts
You want AFK automation with developer quality filters for hands-off memecoinsniping
You use multiple terminals (Axiom, GMGN, Photon) and want fast execution overlaid on them
Your copy trading needs are simple and single-wallet
Bloom and Trojan share the same pricing model (1% fee, no subscription), the same primary interface (Telegram), and the same core market (Solana memecoins). They are the two most compared Telegram trading bots in the Solana space right now.
But they are built around very different edges. Trojan is the largest Solana Telegram bot by volume — $25B+ processed, 2 million users — built for copy traders, DCA strategies, and high-volume referral earners. Bloom is the faster, leaner bot built for traders who hunt alpha on Twitter before it trends.
This comparison covers what actually differs and which one is the right fit.
Trojan is the dominant Solana Telegram trading bot by nearly every metric — volume, users, and feature depth. Its BOLT execution engine targets sub-2-second trade execution with backup bots kicking in during network congestion. BOLT Pro, available for wallets with 50+ SOL, targets near-zero failed transactions.
Copy trading is where Trojan separates itself. The filters go well beyond "copy X% of their buys." You can set max buy amount per transaction, toggle duplicate buys on or off, exclude PumpFun tokens, set minimum liquidity and market cap thresholds, cap daily losses per trader, and run multiple copy targets simultaneously. For traders building a portfolio of copy positions rather than single-wallet copy, Trojan's system is meaningfully more sophisticated.
DCA is fully integrated — Bloom has none. If you want to build into a position over time or ladder out of one, Trojan handles it natively inside Telegram.
The Arena is a gamified rewards layer that distributes SOL to active traders through daily jackpots. With $5M SOL allocated to the pool, it adds a real cashback layer that brings the effective fee down to around 0.72% for active participants — lower than Bloom's 0.9% with referral.
The referral system is also deeper: 5 tiers with 35% on direct referrals, versus Bloom's 3 tiers at 25%. For traders building referral income as a side strategy, Trojan compounds better.
Where Trojan falls short: no Twitter sniping, no browser extension, and no AFK mode with developer quality filters. If the signal is on CT before it hits the charts, Trojan does not act on it automatically.
Bloom: Speed, Twitter Alpha, and Automation
Bloom is the faster, more specialised bot. Its headline feature — Twitter OCR sniping — automatically reads token contract addresses from tweets, replies, and reposts, including addresses embedded in screenshots, and buys before the tweet spreads. No other major Solana bot does this.
AFK Mode lets you set automated buying rules based on developer quality filters — minimum SOL in dev wallets, previous launch success rate, migration history — and walk away. It is not as configurable as Trojan's copy trading, but it is the better tool for running an always-on memecoin sniper without watching a screen.
The browser extension is genuinely useful for traders who use multiple terminals. Bloom overlays fast buy/sell buttons on Axiom, GMGN, Photon, and BullX so you get Bloom's execution speed without leaving whichever terminal you are using for research.
On effective fees: Bloom's referral cashback gives 10% back on your own fees. That is simpler but less powerful than Trojan's Arena + cashback combination for high-volume traders.
Where Bloom falls short: no DCA, and copy trading is more basic than Trojan. If you are running structured copy positions with daily loss limits and multi-trader diversification, Bloom is not the right tool.
You use DCA to build or exit positions
You want the deepest rewards and referral system (The Arena + 5-tier referrals)
You want the largest, most battle-tested bot in the ecosystem
Yes. They do not conflict. A common setup: Trojan for structured copy trades and DCA, Bloom for Twitter-triggered snipes and AFK automation. The Bloom browser extension works alongside Trojan's Telegram bot without interference.
FAQ
Which bot has lower fees in practice?
Trojan's effective fee can reach ~0.72% with The Arena cashback vs. Bloom's 0.9% with referral. For high-volume traders, Trojan is cheaper over time.
Does Bloom have DCA?
No. If DCA is important to your strategy, Trojan is the better choice.
Is Trojan faster than Bloom?
Bloom targets sub-millisecond execution; Trojan's BOLT targets sub-2-seconds. Bloom has the edge on raw execution speed, though both are fast enough for most trades. The difference matters most during network congestion.
Which has better copy trading?
Trojan, clearly. Its copy trading system has more filters, multi-wallet support, and risk management tools. Bloom's copy trading is basic by comparison.
Is Bloom's Twitter sniping worth it?
For traders who use CT as a signal source — yes, it is the only bot that does this automatically. For traders who do not track Twitter for token launches, it is irrelevant.
Are either of these safe?
Both are non-custodial — your keys are encrypted on your device. Standard precautions apply: use dedicated trading wallets with only what you are willing to trade, never share seed phrases.