BonkBot vs Trojan: Which Solana Telegram Bot Should You Use in 2026?
BonkBot and Trojan are both Telegram-native Solana trading bots with a ~1% fee, but they're built for different traders. BonkBot keeps it simple and feeds its fees back into BONK buybacks; Trojan piles on copy trading, DCA, and a cashback rewards layer. Here's how they actually compare.
MadeOnSol·· 7 min read
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, MadeOnSol may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our rankings, ratings, or reviews.
Security: Neither Has Had Its Own Breach
Both bots ask you to trust them with a hot wallet's private key, and both have clean records on that specific point. BonkBot was wrongly blamed for a 2024 exploit that drained roughly $523K from Solana wallets; the actual cause traced to Solareum, a separate app that some BonkBot users had also imported their exported keys into — not a breach of BonkBot's own infrastructure. Trojan has not had a publicized security incident since launching in 2024.
The practical lesson applies to both: keep only active trading funds in either bot's wallet, move profits out regularly, and never import an exported private key into a second application.
Who Should Choose BonkBot
You want the simplest possible Telegram trading experience — paste an address, tap a button, done
You'd rather your trading fees support BONK buybacks and burns than chase a personal cashback tier
You don't need copy trading, DCA, or a web dashboard
You're specifically BONK-community-aligned
Who Should Choose Trojan
Copy trading with multiple wallets and risk controls is central to your strategy
You use DCA to build or exit positions over time
You want the lower effective fee once cashback and referrals are factored in
You want a web terminal option alongside Telegram
Can You Use Both?
Yes — they don't conflict, and some traders run BonkBot for quick manual buys on tokens they've already researched while using Trojan for structured copy trading and DCA. Since both are Telegram bots reading token contract addresses independently, there's no technical overlap to manage.
For how Trojan holds up against a 14-chain generalist rather than a simple, single-purpose bot, see our Maestro vs Trojan comparison.
Trojan, in effective terms. Its 0.9% base fee drops to roughly 0.72% with cashback for active traders. BonkBot charges a flat 1% with no personal cashback mechanism, though 100% of that fee goes toward buying and burning BONK rather than pure bot revenue.
Does BonkBot have copy trading or DCA?
Tools mentioned
Compare features and read reviews.
Live health scores, average ratings, and direct links on MadeOnSol.
BonkBot and Trojan are the two oldest names in Solana Telegram trading bots, and both still process serious volume in 2026. Beyond that, they've grown in different directions: BonkBot has stayed deliberately simple and ties its fee revenue directly to BONK token buybacks and burns. Trojan has kept adding — copy trading with granular filters, DCA, a cashback rewards layer, and (as of mid-2026) a web terminal alongside its Telegram bot.
This comparison covers what's actually different, not just the marketing copy.
(Scale figures are self-reported by each project, not independently audited.)
BonkBot: Simple Execution With a BONK-Aligned Fee Model
BonkBot is the original Solana Telegram trading bot, launched in August 2023, and it has stayed close to its original scope: instant buy/sell, limit orders, trailing stop-loss, partial fills, and one-tap "Auto-strat" playbooks. It integrates directly with Pump.fun, DEXScreener, Birdeye, and Meteora links, so you can paste a token straight from wherever you found it.
What makes BonkBot genuinely distinct is where its 1% fee goes: 100% of it is used to buy BONK on the open market, with 10% of the tokens bought permanently burned. No other major Solana Telegram bot ties its fee model to a specific token's supply this directly — it's less "we take a cut" and more "every trade quietly supports BONK."
Where BonkBot doesn't compete: no copy trading, no dedicated sniping mode, no DCA, and no cashback tier to bring the 1% fee down. For traders who just want fast, reliable manual execution, that's not a dealbreaker — but it does mean BonkBot asks you to do more of the work yourself.
Trojan: The Deeper Feature Set
Trojan has grown into the more fully-featured of the two. Its BOLT execution engine targets sub-2-second trade confirmation, with a higher tier for larger wallets aimed at reducing failed transactions during congestion.
Copy trading is where the gap is widest. Trojan lets you set a max buy amount per trade, toggle duplicate-buy handling, exclude specific launch platforms, set minimum liquidity/market cap thresholds, and cap daily losses — per wallet, across multiple wallets simultaneously. BonkBot has no equivalent feature at all.
DCA is fully native to Trojan — set an interval, an amount, and a total budget, and it executes automatically. BonkBot has nothing comparable.
Trojan also runs a cashback rewards program that returns roughly 20% of your own fees, bringing the effective cost from 0.9% down to about 0.72% for active traders, on top of a 5-tier referral structure paying up to 35% on direct referrals.
Fee Reality Check
BonkBot's 1% is genuinely the highest headline rate of the two, and it has no cashback mechanism to bring it down for individual traders — the fee instead flows into BONK buybacks and burns, which benefits the token rather than your personal cost basis. Trojan's 0.9% base fee, combined with its ~20% cashback, brings the effective rate to roughly 0.72% for traders who opt in.
At $10,000 in monthly volume: BonkBot costs $100 in fees with no way to reduce it as an individual trader. Trojan costs roughly $72 net after cashback. The gap is real for high-volume traders — though BonkBot's fee at least has a transparent, verifiable destination (BONK buybacks/burns) rather than disappearing purely into bot-operator revenue.
No. As of 2026, BonkBot's feature set covers instant buy/sell, limit orders, trailing stop-loss, and partial fills — it does not offer copy trading or DCA. Trojan offers both, with advanced multi-wallet filters for copy trading.
Was BonkBot ever hacked?
Not directly. A 2024 exploit that drained Solana wallets was initially blamed on BonkBot but was traced to Solareum, a separate app some victims had also used. BonkBot's own infrastructure was not the source of the breach.
What happens to BonkBot's trading fees?
100% of BonkBot's 1% fee is used to buy BONK tokens on the open market, and 10% of those purchased tokens are permanently burned. This is a fee model no other major Solana Telegram bot replicates.
Is Trojan or BonkBot better for beginners?
BonkBot's minimal interface (paste an address, tap buy) has a slightly lower learning curve. Trojan's extra features — copy trading, DCA, cashback tiers — are more powerful but require more setup to use well.
Want the full breakdown of each bot individually? Read our BonkBot review and Trojan review, or run your expected monthly volume through the bot fee calculator to see the dollar difference for yourself.
