Head-to-head · Bridges
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Chainflip Chainflip is a decentralized cross-chain swap protocol that lets users trade native assets across blockchains, including Solana, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, without bridges or wrapped tokens. Its hook is m... Eclipse Eclipse is the first Ethereum Layer 2 built on the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), combining Ethereum's security and liquidity with Solana's parallel execution engine. Live on mainnet since late 2024, E...
Eclipse is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Chainflip (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Chainflip uses a free model, while Eclipse is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Chainflip offers 5 features including Native cross-chain swaps, no wrapped tokens, Supports Solana, Bitcoin, Ethereum and more, Substrate-based State Chain for swap logic, and 2 more. Eclipse counters with 5 features including Solana VM execution on Ethereum L2, 1,000+ TPS with parallel transaction processing, Native Ethereum bridge for asset transfers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Chainflip currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Eclipse is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Chainflip's key strengths include avoids bridges and wrapped-token risk, native asset settlement across chains, no kyc for swapping. Eclipse stands out for best of both ethereum and solana ecosystems, high throughput from svm execution, ethereum-grade security via settlement. On the flip side, Chainflip's weaknesses include multi-chain protocol, not solana-specific, while Eclipse's main drawback is additional bridge risk between ethereum and eclipse.
More comparisons
Compare Chainflip with…
Compare Eclipse with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 75,886 | 235,153 |
| Categories | Bridges | Developer Tools, Bridges |
| Description | Native cross-chain swaps without bridges or wrapped tokens | Ethereum L2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine for high-throughput dApps |
Both Chainflip and Eclipse operate in the bridges space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Eclipse has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Chainflip is free to start and Eclipse is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.