Head-to-head · Bridges
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 20, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Eclipse Eclipse is the first Ethereum Layer 2 built on the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), combining Ethereum's security and liquidity with Solana's parallel execution engine. Live on mainnet since late 2024, E... Solaxy Solaxy markets itself as the first Solana Layer 2, with a bridge to Ethereum aimed at offloading congestion and scaling transactions. Its own site, however, also carries a disclaimer describing $SOLX...
Eclipse is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Solaxy (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Eclipse uses a free model, while Solaxy is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Eclipse offers 5 features including Solana VM execution on Ethereum L2, 1,000+ TPS with parallel transaction processing, Native Ethereum bridge for asset transfers, and 2 more. Solaxy counters with 5 features including Claimed first Solana Layer 2 rollup, Ethereum bridge for cross-chain transfers, Layer-2 testnet with SOL devnet bridge, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Eclipse currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Solaxy is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Eclipse's key strengths include best of both ethereum and solana ecosystems, high throughput from svm execution, ethereum-grade security via settlement. Solaxy stands out for addresses a real solana scalability narrative, working testnet and bridge demonstrated, ran a security bug-bounty before launch. On the flip side, Eclipse's weaknesses include additional bridge risk between ethereum and eclipse, while Solaxy's main drawback is mainnet not launched and core product unproven.
More comparisons
Compare Eclipse with…
Compare Solaxy with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 234,719 | 57,525 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Bridges | Bridges |
| Description | Ethereum L2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine for high-throughput dApps | Presale-stage Solana Layer 2 with Ethereum bridge; testnet live, mainnet pending |
Both Eclipse and Solaxy operate in the bridges space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Eclipse has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Eclipse is free to start and Solaxy is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.