FluxRPC vs DEXScreener

Overview

FluxRPC FluxRPC is a performance-focused RPC provider for Solana — and the emerging Fogo chain — that architecturally separates the RPC serving layer from the validator. Decoupling the two lets it tune, cache... DEXScreener DEXScreener is a real-time decentralized exchange analytics platform that tracks trading activity across multiple blockchains, with particularly strong coverage of Solana. It has become one of the mos...

Community Ratings

DEXScreener is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for FluxRPC (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

FluxRPC uses a paid model, while DEXScreener is free — Free to use with no account required. Paid services for projects: token profile updates/boosts cost $299-$999+.. DEXScreener has the edge for budget-conscious users, though FluxRPC's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.

Key Features

FluxRPC offers 5 features including Solana and Fogo RPC endpoints, RPC serving decoupled from the validator layer, HTTP/3 + QUIC transport for low latency, and 2 more. DEXScreener counters with 8 features including Real-time price charts with sub-second data updates across all chains, Multi-chain coverage including Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC, and 20+ networks, Token discovery with trending, new pairs, top gainers, and boosted listings, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FluxRPC currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. DEXScreener is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

FluxRPC's key strengths include predictable bandwidth-based pricing vs. opaque credit systems, modern transport (http/3 / quic) for lower latency, hackathon-validated and already in production use.