Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 22, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (4) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FluxRPC FluxRPC is a performance-focused RPC provider for Solana — and the emerging Fogo chain — that architecturally separates the RPC serving layer from the validator. Decoupling the two lets it tune, cache... GetBlock GetBlock offers Solana RPC access through both shared and dedicated node plans. With 130+ blockchain networks supported, it provides a simple API dashboard, request analytics, and flexible pricing tha...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for FluxRPC (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FluxRPC uses a paid model, while GetBlock is freemium.
FluxRPC offers 5 features including Solana and Fogo RPC endpoints, RPC serving decoupled from the validator layer, HTTP/3 + QUIC transport for low latency, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Shared and dedicated Solana nodes, 130+ blockchain networks, Request analytics dashboard, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FluxRPC currently has a unknown health status. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FluxRPC's key strengths include predictable bandwidth-based pricing vs. opaque credit systems, modern transport (http/3 / quic) for lower latency, hackathon-validated and already in production use. GetBlock stands out for generous free tier for testing, multi-chain support from one provider, simple setup and api key management. On the flip side, FluxRPC's weaknesses include newer provider competing with entrenched rpc incumbents, while GetBlock's main drawback is shared nodes have variable latency.
More comparisons
Compare FluxRPC with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 23,950 |
| Categories | RPC Providers, Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | Solana RPC decoupled from the validator layer — HTTP/3 + QUIC with flat per-byte bandwidth pricing | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
Both FluxRPC and GetBlock operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check FluxRPC's pricing and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.