Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 4, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Goldsky Goldsky is a blockchain data infrastructure provider that offers subgraph hosting and Mirror streaming pipelines for Solana and 140+ other chains. The platform is designed for developers who need reli... Pimlico Pimlico provides account abstraction infrastructure - bundlers, paymasters and supporting APIs - and lists Robinhood Chain as an explicitly supported network, covering both mainnet 4663 and testnet 46...
Goldsky is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Pimlico (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Goldsky uses a freemium model, while Pimlico is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Goldsky offers 5 features including Subgraph hosting for Solana and 140+ chains, Mirror real-time data streaming pipelines, GraphQL API for indexed on-chain data, and 2 more. Pimlico counters with 4 features including ERC-4337 bundler operated for Robinhood Chain mainnet and testnet, Paymaster service for sponsoring user gas costs, Support for EntryPoint v0.6 and v0.7, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Goldsky currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Pimlico is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Goldsky's key strengths include eliminates need to build custom indexing infrastructure, real-time streaming reduces reliance on rpc polling, supports 140+ chains including solana. Pimlico stands out for explicitly declared robinhood chain support rather than generic evm compatibility, gas sponsorship removes the biggest onboarding obstacle for new users, covers testnet as well as mainnet, so the full development cycle is supported.
More comparisons
Compare Goldsky with…
Compare Pimlico with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,417 | — |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | SDKs & Libraries, Developer Tools |
| Description | Real-time blockchain data infrastructure with subgraph hosting and streaming pipelines | ERC-4337 bundler and paymaster infrastructure for Robinhood Chain |
Both Goldsky and Pimlico operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Goldsky has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Goldsky is free to start and Pimlico is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.