Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Sardine Sardine provides fraud prevention and compliance infrastructure alongside a fiat-to-crypto onramp API, giving Solana apps a single provider for both moving users from fiat into crypto and protecting a...
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Sardine (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Hacken uses a paid model, while Sardine is paid.
Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Sardine counters with 5 features including AI-powered real-time fraud detection, Fiat-to-crypto onramp API for SOL and SPL tokens, Instant ACH and card payment support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sardine is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Sardine stands out for one integration for onboarding plus fraud and compliance, reports reducing fraud losses by up to 90%, used by major crypto companies, signaling enterprise readiness. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Sardine's main drawback is centralized service handling payments and compliance data.
More comparisons
Compare Hacken with…
Compare Sardine with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 133,975 | 443 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Payment Tools |
| Description | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise | Fraud prevention and fiat-to-crypto onramp for Solana apps |
Both Hacken and Sardine operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Hacken's pricing and check Sardine's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.