Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....
Both GetBlock and Hacken hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
GetBlock uses a freemium model, while Hacken is paid.
GetBlock offers 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GetBlock currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GetBlock's key strengths include broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, GetBlock's weaknesses include general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).
More comparisons
Compare GetBlock with…
Compare Hacken with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,949 | 133,975 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Security & Audit |
| Description | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise |
While GetBlock (RPC Providers) and Hacken (Security & Audit) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — GetBlock is free to start and check Hacken's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.