Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Three Sigma Three Sigma is a Web3 security firm specializing in smart contract audits, economic risk modeling, and exploit prevention across multiple ecosystems including Solana. With 150+ audits completed protec...
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Three Sigma (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Hacken uses a paid model, while Three Sigma is paid.
Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Three Sigma counters with 4 features including Comprehensive Rust and Solana smart contract audits, Economic risk modeling for DeFi protocols, Threat modeling for CPI injection and signer vulnerabilities, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Three Sigma is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Three Sigma stands out for extensive audit track record with $10b+ protected, multi-chain rust expertise across solana, near, and polkadot. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Three Sigma's main drawback is not exclusively solana-focused.
More comparisons
Compare Hacken with…
Compare Three Sigma with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 133,975 | 13,180 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise | Web3 security audits and economic risk modeling for Solana and beyond |
Both Hacken and Three Sigma operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Hacken's pricing and check Three Sigma's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.