Hacken vs ZealynX

Overview

Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... ZealynX ZealynX is a blockchain security firm specializing in Solana and Rust smart contract audits, penetration testing, and AI red team audits. It focuses on the unique security challenges of the Solana run...

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for ZealynX (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Hacken uses a paid model, while ZealynX is paid.

Key Features

Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. ZealynX counters with 5 features including Solana and Rust smart contract audits, Penetration testing for on-chain protocols, AI red team audits for added coverage, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. ZealynX is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. ZealynX stands out for specialized in solana's distinct rust runtime security, multiple methods including pen testing and ai red teaming, immunefi bounty integration extends continuous coverage. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while ZealynX's main drawback is audits reduce but never eliminate vulnerability risk.