Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 14, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
HolderScan HolderScan delivers real-time holder analytics for tokens across Solana, Ethereum and Base. It breaks down a token's holder distribution, tracks whale concentration, and segments wallets into diamond... Pyth Network Pyth Network is a high-fidelity oracle network that delivers real-time price data to Solana and other blockchains. Unlike traditional oracles that source data from public APIs, Pyth aggregates price f...
Pyth Network is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for HolderScan (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
HolderScan uses a freemium model, while Pyth Network is free — Free to consume price feeds. Small update fee paid per price pull on some chains. PYTH token used for governance and data staking.. Pyth Network has the edge for budget-conscious users, though HolderScan's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
HolderScan offers 5 features including Real-time holder distribution charts, Whale and concentration tracking, Diamond-hands / accumulator / seller wallet segmentation, and 2 more. Pyth Network counters with 8 features including Real-time price feeds from 90+ institutional data contributors, Sub-second update latency (~400ms on Solana) for real-time DeFi, 500+ price feeds covering crypto, equities, forex, and commodities, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. HolderScan currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Pyth Network is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
HolderScan's key strengths include real-time holder data spanning solana, ethereum and base, concentration and whale metrics quickly surface risky distributions, wallet explorer plus api covers both manual and automated workflows.
More comparisons
Compare HolderScan with…
Compare Pyth Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 287,530 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Analytics & Charts | Data & Indexing, Oracles |
| Description | Real-time token holder analytics — distribution, whales, and diamond hands | High-fidelity oracle network delivering real-time price data |
Both HolderScan and Pyth Network operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Pyth Network has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — HolderScan is free to start and Pyth Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.