Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 29, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Both Hyperstack and Sanctum hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Hyperstack uses a freemium model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Sanctum has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Hyperstack's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Hyperstack offers 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hyperstack currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hyperstack's key strengths include schema-first workflow collapses backend and frontend data plumbing, generated react hooks speed the path from data to live ui, keeps on-chain backend and frontend in sync without glue code.
More comparisons
Compare Hyperstack with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 15,745 | 81,071 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
While Hyperstack (Developer Tools) and Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Hyperstack is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.