Head-to-head · Comparison
Sanctum vs Trojan on Solana
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 16, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
Sanctum
- Solves LST liquidity fragmentation with unified Infinity pool
- Enables any validator to create their own LST — democratizes liquid staking
- INF token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual LSTs
- Zero-slippage LST swaps improve capital efficiency for DeFi strategies
- Growing ecosystem of validator LSTs creates unique staking opportunities
- Smart contract risk across the multi-LST pool infrastructure
- Newer protocol with less battle-testing than established LST providers
- Validator LST proliferation may confuse users with too many options
- CLOUD tokenomics and value accrual still evolving
Trojan on Solana
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Trojan on Solana Trojan on Solana is one of the most popular Telegram-based trading bots for the Solana ecosystem, offering fast token swaps, sniping capabilities, and comprehensive trading tools directly within Teleg...
Community Ratings
Both Sanctum and Trojan on Solana hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Trojan on Solana is freemium — Free to use. 1% fee on transactions, reduced to 0.9% with referral. Referrers earn 25-35% of referred users' fees.. Sanctum has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Trojan on Solana's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Trojan on Solana counters with 8 features including Telegram-based trading with instant token swaps via contract address, Token sniping with customizable trigger conditions and auto-buy, Copy trading to automatically mirror profitable wallet transactions, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Trojan on Solana is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.