Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
JPool JPool is a liquid staking protocol on Solana that lets users stake SOL and receive JSOL, a token that stays liquid while the underlying SOL keeps earning staking rewards. The hook: keep your stake wor... Phase Labs Phase Labs is a Solana staking infrastructure provider that issues phaseSOL, a liquid staking token representing SOL delegated through its validator setup. The hook is staking that stays liquid, so th...
Both JPool and Phase Labs hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
JPool uses a free model, while Phase Labs is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
JPool offers 5 features including JSOL liquid staking token, Automated validator delegation, Built on Solana Stake Pool Program, and 2 more. Phase Labs counters with 5 features including phaseSOL liquid staking token, Non-custodial SOL staking, Enterprise-grade validator infrastructure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. JPool currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Phase Labs is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
JPool's key strengths include keeps staked sol liquid via jsol, no lockup to access funds, automated validator selection. Phase Labs stands out for keeps staked sol liquid via phasesol, non-custodial; keys stay with the user, hardened validator and multisig security. On the flip side, JPool's weaknesses include smart-contract and slashing risk, while Phase Labs's main drawback is smaller lst with less liquidity than jito or marinade.
More comparisons
Compare JPool with…
Compare Phase Labs with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 25,300 | — |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | Liquid Staking |
| Description | Solana liquid staking protocol with automatic validator selection | Solana liquid staking provider offering phaseSOL LST with enterprise-grade validator infrastructure |
Both JPool and Phase Labs operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — JPool is free to start and Phase Labs is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.