Head-to-head · Bridges
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 3, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Mayan Finance Mayan Finance is a cross-chain swap protocol that enables users to bridge and swap assets between Solana and other major blockchains in a single transaction. Built on top of Wormhole's messaging infra... Kima Network Kima Network is a universal settlement layer built to enable seamless transfers across public blockchains, private blockchains, and even traditional bank accounts. A distinguishing design choice is th...
Kima Network is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.5/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Mayan Finance (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Mayan Finance uses a free model — No platform fee. Users pay a small relayer fee embedded in the swap quote. Mayan earns from the spread in the relayer auction. All fees shown upfront., while Kima Network is freemium. Mayan Finance has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Kima Network's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Mayan Finance offers 8 features including Cross-chain swaps between Solana and 15+ blockchains in a single transaction, Auction-based relay system ensuring competitive pricing for cross-chain transfers, Sub-60-second completion times for most cross-chain swaps, and 5 more. Kima Network counters with 5 features including Universal settlement layer across public and private blockchains, Transfers that connect to traditional bank accounts, Operates without relying on smart contracts, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Mayan Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Kima Network is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Mayan Finance with…
Compare Kima Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 36,490 | 427,618 |
| Categories | Bridges | Payment Tools, Bridges |
| Description | Cross-chain swap protocol — bridge assets between Solana, Ethereum, and 10+ chains instantly via Wormhole | Cross-ecosystem money transfer protocol — connect blockchains and bank accounts |
Mayan Finance's key strengths include fastest cross-chain swaps available — most complete in under 60 seconds, single-transaction ux eliminates the multi-step bridge-then-swap workflow, competitive pricing through auction mechanism — relayers compete to give best rates. Kima Network stands out for connects blockchains with traditional bank accounts, broad multi-chain coverage in one settlement layer, smart-contract-free design reduces a common exploit surface. On the flip side, Mayan Finance's weaknesses include depends on wormhole infrastructure — any wormhole downtime affects mayan, while Kima Network's main drawback is solana is one of many supported chains, not the focus.
Both Mayan Finance and Kima Network operate in the bridges space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Kima Network has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Mayan Finance is free to start and Kima Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.