Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Jupiter Terminal Jupiter Terminal is an open-source, embeddable swap component built by Jupiter, the leading swap aggregator on Solana. It lets developers drop full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, s...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Jupiter Terminal (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Jupiter Terminal is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Jupiter Terminal counters with 5 features including Open-source embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter, Drops full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, Automatic slippage management, retries, and transaction handling, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Jupiter Terminal is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Jupiter Terminal with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,071 | 616,801 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DEXs & Swaps, Developer Tools |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter for any Solana dApp |
While Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) and Jupiter Terminal (DEXs & Swaps) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Jupiter Terminal is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.