Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 8, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (3) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f... Foxify Foxify is a P2P perpetual futures trading protocol on Solana where users can create custom trading pairs and take the other side of trades. Unlike traditional perp DEXs that use liquidity pools, Foxif...
Foxify is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 4.8/5 for Sandglass (4 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sandglass uses a free model, while Foxify is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sandglass offers 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. Foxify counters with 6 features including P2P perpetual futures trading, Custom trading pair creation, Up to 200x leverage, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sandglass currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Foxify is rated healthy with 99.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sandglass's key strengths include brings pendle-style yield tokenization natively to solana, enables predictable fixed-rate returns through pt, supports both lst and lending yields as sources. Foxify stands out for unique p2p model for perps, custom pairs not available elsewhere, high leverage options. On the flip side, Sandglass's weaknesses include yield tokenization is conceptually complex for newcomers, while Foxify's main drawback is p2p model requires counterparty.
More comparisons
Compare Sandglass with…
Compare Foxify with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,270 | 18,562 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies | Peer-to-peer perpetual futures DEX on Solana with customizable trading pairs |
Both Sandglass and Foxify operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Foxify has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sandglass is free to start and Foxify is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.