Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 4, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Frames Frames, formerly MCPay, is open payment infrastructure connecting the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with x402 HTTP payments on Solana. It lets AI agents and apps pay for resources over standard web req... Goldsky Goldsky is a blockchain data infrastructure provider that offers subgraph hosting and Mirror streaming pipelines for Solana and 140+ other chains. The platform is designed for developers who need reli...
Frames is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Goldsky (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Frames uses a free model, while Goldsky is freemium. Frames has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Goldsky's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Frames offers 5 features including Bridges MCP protocol with x402 HTTP payments, Instant micropayments on Solana stablecoin rails, Pay-per-call without accounts or API keys, and 2 more. Goldsky counters with 5 features including Subgraph hosting for Solana and 140+ chains, Mirror real-time data streaming pipelines, GraphQL API for indexed on-chain data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Frames currently has a healthy health status with 95.7% uptime over the last 30 days. Goldsky is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Frames's key strengths include enables agent-native, per-request payments, removes account and key provisioning friction, stablecoin settlement on solana for low-cost transfers. Goldsky stands out for eliminates need to build custom indexing infrastructure, real-time streaming reduces reliance on rpc polling, supports 140+ chains including solana.
More comparisons
Compare Frames with…
Compare Goldsky with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 2,019 | 11,417 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Payment Tools | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Open payment infrastructure connecting MCP protocol and x402 on Solana | Real-time blockchain data infrastructure with subgraph hosting and streaming pipelines |
Both Frames and Goldsky operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Frames has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Frames is free to start and Goldsky is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.