Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 4, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Unknown |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
OnRe OnRe brings reinsurance premiums on-chain through Solana, letting DeFi users deposit stablecoins into regulated reinsurance pools and earn yield that is uncorrelated to crypto markets. It is an RWA-yi... Sherwood Protocol Sherwood is a vault protocol that lets an AI agent run an on-chain fund without ever holding the keys. Capital sits in a standard ERC-4626 vault, the agent publishes a strategy proposal committing in...
OnRe is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Sherwood Protocol (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
OnRe uses a free model, while Sherwood Protocol is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
OnRe offers 5 features including On-chain reinsurance yield protocol on Solana, Deposit stablecoins into regulated reinsurance pools, Targeted 10–16% real yield, and 2 more. Sherwood Protocol counters with 4 features including ERC-4626 vaults with agent-managed strategies and share-weighted depositor voting, Guardian network that replays proposal calldata on a fork, with slashing for bad approvals, Published four-fee waterfall with numeric caps and no AUM fee, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. OnRe currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sherwood Protocol is rated unknown. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
OnRe's key strengths include yield source uncorrelated to crypto cycles, real-world (insurance) backing, notable institutional backers. Sherwood Protocol stands out for unusual security model — pre-committed calldata reviewed by economically slashable guardians rather than a trusted keeper, fee structure fully published with caps, and performance fees accrue only on profit, documentation depth well above the norm for projects on this chain.
More comparisons
Compare OnRe with…
Compare Sherwood Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 76,801 | — |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | AI Agents, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | On-chain reinsurance yield protocol delivering 10-16% real APY on Solana | Agent-managed ERC-4626 vaults where staked guardians replay every strategy before it executes |
Both OnRe and Sherwood Protocol operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. OnRe has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — OnRe is free to start and Sherwood Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.