Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 9, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (8) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Phantom Phantom is the most widely used wallet in the Solana ecosystem and has become synonymous with Solana itself. With millions of active users, Phantom provides a seamless gateway to DeFi, NFTs, token swa... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 4.6/5 for Phantom (8 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Phantom uses a free model — Free to use. Built-in swap charges approximately 0.85% fee. Staking is free with standard validator commission., while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Phantom offers 8 features including Browser extension and mobile app with full feature parity, Built-in token swap aggregator powered by Jupiter for best prices, Native SOL staking with validator selection and rewards tracking, and 5 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Phantom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Phantom's key strengths include most widely supported wallet — works with virtually every solana dapp, intuitive design that makes blockchain interactions accessible to beginners, strong security with transaction simulation and phishing protection.
More comparisons
Compare Phantom with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 6 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 949,705 | 80,714 |
| Categories | Wallets | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Most-used Solana wallet — send, swap, stake SOL, and manage NFTs with built-in DEX aggregation and hardware wallet support | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
While Phantom (Wallets) and Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Phantom is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.