Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Accretion Accretion is a security audit firm dedicated exclusively to the Solana ecosystem, having protected over $1.5 billion in TVL across 35+ protocols. Unlike multi-chain audit firms that spread expertise a... Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge...
Range is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Accretion (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Accretion uses a paid model, while Range is paid.
Accretion offers 5 features including Solana-exclusive security audits, $1.5B+ TVL protected across 35+ protocols, Deep CPI/PDA vulnerability expertise, and 2 more. Range counters with 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Accretion currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Range is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Accretion's key strengths include 100% solana-focused — deepest possible expertise, proven track record protecting major protocols, publishes transparent audit reports. Range stands out for promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. On the flip side, Accretion's weaknesses include solana-only — not suitable for multi-chain projects, while Range's main drawback is aimed at protocols and operators, not end users.
More comparisons
Compare Accretion with…
Compare Range with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,658 | 60 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Solana-dedicated smart contract audit firm protecting $1.5B+ TVL across 35+ protocols | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols |
Both Accretion and Range operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Range has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Accretion's pricing and check Range's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.