Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Ankr Ankr is a multi-chain Web3 node and RPC infrastructure provider that gives developers programmatic access to blockchain data across 80+ networks, including Solana, Ethereum, Bitcoin, Polygon and Arbit... Ligma Node Ligma Node provides private, high-performance Solana RPC nodes aimed at traders and automation that need low-latency network access. It markets dedicated bare-metal infrastructure rather than shared p...
Ankr is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Ligma Node (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Ankr uses a freemium model, while Ligma Node is paid.
Ankr offers 5 features including Multi-chain RPC node access across 80+ blockchains including Solana, with HTTPS and WSS endpoints, Advanced APIs (Token API, NFT API, Query API) serving indexed and cached blockchain data for multi-chain queries, Globally distributed node network with platform-level load balancing across multiple regions, and 2 more. Ligma Node counters with 5 features including Dedicated bare-metal Solana RPC nodes, Multi-region (USA, EU, Asia) deployment, Geyser streaming support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Ankr currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Ligma Node is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Ankr's key strengths include single provider covering 80+ chains, useful for multi-chain projects, free public and freemium tiers allow testing before paying, flexible credit-based billing with pay-as-you-go ($10 minimum) and monthly deal options. Ligma Node stands out for dedicated infrastructure, not shared endpoints, regional selection for lower latency, unlimited bandwidth and requests.
More comparisons
Compare Ankr with…
Compare Ligma Node with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 307,319 | 4,900 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | Decentralized Web3 infrastructure with Solana RPC endpoints | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers |
Both Ankr and Ligma Node operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Ankr has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Ankr is free to start and check Ligma Node's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.