Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Ankr Ankr is a multi-chain Web3 node and RPC infrastructure provider that gives developers programmatic access to blockchain data across 80+ networks, including Solana, Ethereum, Bitcoin, Polygon and Arbit... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
Both Ankr and RPC Fast hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Ankr uses a freemium model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
Ankr offers 5 features including Multi-chain RPC node access across 80+ blockchains including Solana, with HTTPS and WSS endpoints, Advanced APIs (Token API, NFT API, Query API) serving indexed and cached blockchain data for multi-chain queries, Globally distributed node network with platform-level load balancing across multiple regions, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Ankr currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Ankr's key strengths include single provider covering 80+ chains, useful for multi-chain projects, free public and freemium tiers allow testing before paying, flexible credit-based billing with pay-as-you-go ($10 minimum) and monthly deal options. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation.
More comparisons
Compare Ankr with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 307,319 | 454 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | Decentralized Web3 infrastructure with Solana RPC endpoints | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both Ankr and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Ankr is free to start and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.