Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Anza Anza is the primary Solana protocol development firm, responsible for building and maintaining the Agave validator client — the most widely used Solana validator implementation. Spun out from Solana L... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Anza (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Anza uses a free model, while GetBlock is freemium. Anza has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Anza offers 5 features including Agave validator client development, Solana SDK with 100+ modular crates, Pinocchio zero-dependency program framework, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Anza currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Anza's key strengths include the primary solana protocol development team, open-source contributions benefit entire ecosystem, deep expertise in solana internals. GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, Anza's weaknesses include not a consumer-facing product, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Anza with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | 21,568 | 23,949 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | Solana core R&D lab building the Agave validator client and Solana developer SDK | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While Anza (Developer Tools) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Anza is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.