Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Arweave Arweave is a decentralized permanent storage network widely used by Solana projects for immutable, long-lived data storage. Its core innovation is a pay-once, store-forever model: instead of recurring... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
Both Arweave and GetBlock hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Arweave uses a paid model, while GetBlock is freemium.
Arweave offers 5 features including Pay-once, store-forever permanent data storage, Endowment-based economic model funding long-term persistence, Powers Solana NFT image and metadata permanence, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Arweave currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Arweave's key strengths include single upfront payment instead of recurring storage fees, immutable, censorship-resistant storage for critical nft and app data, well-integrated with solana minting workflows via irys. GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, Arweave's weaknesses include permanence means data cannot be deleted or corrected once written, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Arweave with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | 107,971 | 23,949 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | Permanent decentralized storage for Solana data and NFT assets | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While Arweave (Developer Tools) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Arweave's pricing and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.