Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (6) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana + Robinhood Chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 8 |
| Twitter Followers | 107,543 | 23,366 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | Permanent decentralized storage for Solana data and NFT assets | Managed RPC node provider offering Robinhood Chain mainnet and testnet endpoints among 130+ supported chains |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Arweave Arweave is a decentralized permanent storage network widely used by Solana projects for immutable, long-lived data storage. Its core innovation is a pay-once, store-forever model: instead of recurring... GetBlock GetBlock is a Web3 infrastructure provider that gives developers instant access to blockchain RPC nodes rather than requiring them to run their own, supporting more than 130 protocols across mainnet a...
Arweave is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.8/5 for GetBlock (6 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Arweave uses a paid model, while GetBlock is freemium.
Arweave offers 5 features including Pay-once, store-forever permanent data storage, Endowment-based economic model funding long-term persistence, Powers Solana NFT image and metadata permanence, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Managed JSON-RPC, REST, WebSocket and GraphQL access to Robinhood Chain, Coverage of both RHC mainnet (chain ID 4663) and testnet (chain ID 46630), Shared usage-based plans billed in Compute Units, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Arweave currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Arweave's key strengths include single upfront payment instead of recurring storage fees, immutable, censorship-resistant storage for critical nft and app data, well-integrated with solana minting workflows via irys. GetBlock stands out for removes the need to run and maintain an arbitrum orbit node just to reach robinhood chain, dedicated-node tier gives high-volume rhc builders a predictable, unmetered option, standard evm-compatible rpc means existing ethereum tooling works against rhc endpoints unchanged. On the flip side, Arweave's weaknesses include permanence means data cannot be deleted or corrected once written, while GetBlock's main drawback is dedicated node pricing starts at $1,000/month, out of reach for small or hobby projects.
While Arweave (Developer Tools) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Arweave has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Arweave's pricing and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Arweave with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.