Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Asgard Finance Asgard Finance is a Solana-native DeFi protocol building credit-backed structured positions for advanced on-chain trading. Rather than simple swaps, it focuses on capital efficiency — letting sophisti... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Asgard Finance (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Asgard Finance uses a free model, while GetBlock is freemium. Asgard Finance has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Asgard Finance offers 5 features including Credit-backed structured trading positions, MEV-shielded routing against front-running, Sub-1-block limit orders, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Asgard Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Asgard Finance's key strengths include backed by robot ventures and solana ventures with $2.2m seed, mev-shielded routing protects trade execution, broad coverage across 200+ solana assets. GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, Asgard Finance's weaknesses include leverage amplifies losses and carries liquidation risk, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Asgard Finance with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,226 | 23,949 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Trading Bots | RPC Providers |
| Description | Credit-powered structured DeFi positions on Solana | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While Asgard Finance (DeFi & Yield) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Asgard Finance is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.