Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Atomic Wallet Atomic Wallet is a non-custodial multi-chain wallet that supports over 500 cryptocurrencies, including SOL and SPL tokens. It gives users full control of their private keys while bringing assets from... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Atomic Wallet (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Atomic Wallet uses a free model, while Figment is paid. Atomic Wallet has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Figment's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Atomic Wallet offers 5 features including Non-custodial support for 500+ cryptocurrencies including SOL and SPL tokens, Built-in Solana staking earning up to 7% APY, In-app swapping and asset management, and 2 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Atomic Wallet currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Atomic Wallet's key strengths include non-custodial — users keep full control of their keys, stake sol directly in-app for up to 7% apy, broad cross-platform support including a strong desktop client. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration.
More comparisons
Compare Atomic Wallet with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 122,229 | 27,188 |
| Categories | Wallets, Staking | Staking |
| Description | Multi-chain desktop and mobile wallet with built-in Solana staking | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |
Both Atomic Wallet and Figment operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Atomic Wallet is free to start and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.