Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Axiom Axiom is an ultra-fast Solana trading terminal designed for professional and semi-professional traders who demand the lowest possible latency and the most advanced execution features. It has quickly g... Backpack Backpack is a next-generation Solana wallet that combines a browser extension wallet with an integrated centralized exchange (Backpack Exchange), offering a unique hybrid approach to crypto trading an...
Both Axiom and Backpack hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Axiom uses a freemium model — Free to use. 1% base trading fee with tiered SOL cashback: Explorer (0.9%), Hunter (0.8%), Trader (0.7%), Champion (0.6%). Referral codes give 10-20% additional discount., while Backpack is free — Free to use. Standard network fees apply for transactions.. Backpack has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Axiom's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Axiom offers 8 features including Ultra-low latency trading execution optimized for Solana, Real-time token scanning and new launch detection, Advanced charting with multiple timeframes and technical indicators, and 5 more. Backpack counters with 8 features including Browser extension wallet with integrated centralized exchange, xNFT architecture — run applications directly inside the wallet, Seamless movement between self-custody wallet and exchange trading, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Axiom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Backpack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Axiom's key strengths include among the fastest trading terminals on solana for execution speed, comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and telegram bots, professional-grade tools suitable for serious active traders.
More comparisons
Compare Axiom with…
Compare Backpack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 80,270 | 319,385 |
| Categories | Trading Bots | Wallets |
| Description | Y Combinator-backed all-in-one Solana trading terminal with non-custodial wallets, wallet tracking, and tiered cashback fees. | Next-gen Solana wallet with built-in exchange and xNFT support |
While Axiom (Trading Bots) and Backpack (Wallets) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Axiom is free to start and Backpack is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.