Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Axiom Axiom is an ultra-fast Solana trading terminal designed for professional and semi-professional traders who demand the lowest possible latency and the most advanced execution features. It has quickly g... MetaDAO MetaDAO is the first DAO to implement functional futarchy governance on a mainnet blockchain. For each proposal, two prediction markets are created where traders bet real capital on whether the propos...
Axiom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for MetaDAO (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Axiom uses a freemium model — Free to use. 1% base trading fee with tiered SOL cashback: Explorer (0.9%), Hunter (0.8%), Trader (0.7%), Champion (0.6%). Referral codes give 10-20% additional discount., while MetaDAO is free — Free to participate. Users interact through prediction market trading on proposals.. MetaDAO has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Axiom's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Axiom offers 8 features including Ultra-low latency trading execution optimized for Solana, Real-time token scanning and new launch detection, Advanced charting with multiple timeframes and technical indicators, and 5 more. MetaDAO counters with 5 features including Futarchy governance through dual prediction markets per proposal, Futarchy as a Service (FaaS) for other Solana DAOs and token launches, Market-driven decision-making replacing traditional token-weighted voting, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Axiom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. MetaDAO is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Axiom with…
Compare MetaDAO with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 80,270 | 43,024 |
| Categories | Trading Bots | Prediction Markets |
| Description | Y Combinator-backed all-in-one Solana trading terminal with non-custodial wallets, wallet tracking, and tiered cashback fees. | Markets, not votes — futarchy-based governance and prediction markets for DAOs on Solana. |
Axiom's key strengths include among the fastest trading terminals on solana for execution speed, comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and telegram bots, professional-grade tools suitable for serious active traders. MetaDAO stands out for eliminates governance theater by requiring traders to risk real capital on proposals, inherent resistance to vote manipulation — demonstrated resilience in real attacks, growing adoption from major solana protocols like drift, jito, and sanctum. On the flip side, Axiom's weaknesses include complex interface has a steeper learning curve for beginners, while MetaDAO's main drawback is only useful for significant governance decisions that would plausibly move token price.
While Axiom (Trading Bots) and MetaDAO (Prediction Markets) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Axiom has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Axiom is free to start and MetaDAO is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.