Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Axiom Axiom is an ultra-fast Solana trading terminal designed for professional and semi-professional traders who demand the lowest possible latency and the most advanced execution features. It has quickly g... QuickNode QuickNode is a major Web3 infrastructure provider offering high-performance blockchain nodes, APIs, and developer tools across 25+ blockchains including Solana. As one of the largest multi-chain infra...
Axiom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for QuickNode (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Axiom uses a freemium model — Free to use. 1% base trading fee with tiered SOL cashback: Explorer (0.9%), Hunter (0.8%), Trader (0.7%), Champion (0.6%). Referral codes give 10-20% additional discount., while QuickNode is freemium — Free tier for testing. Build: $49/mo. Scale: $299/mo. Business: $799/mo. Enterprise: custom pricing.. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Axiom offers 8 features including Ultra-low latency trading execution optimized for Solana, Real-time token scanning and new launch detection, Advanced charting with multiple timeframes and technical indicators, and 5 more. QuickNode counters with 8 features including High-performance Solana RPC endpoints with global load balancing, Multi-chain support across 25+ blockchains from a single platform, QuickAlerts webhook system for on-chain event notifications, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Axiom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. QuickNode is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Axiom with…
Compare QuickNode with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 80,270 | 47,004 |
| Categories | Trading Bots | RPC Providers |
| Description | Y Combinator-backed all-in-one Solana trading terminal with non-custodial wallets, wallet tracking, and tiered cashback fees. | Multi-chain Web3 infrastructure powering dApps at scale |
Axiom's key strengths include among the fastest trading terminals on solana for execution speed, comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and telegram bots, professional-grade tools suitable for serious active traders. QuickNode stands out for multi-chain support is ideal for teams building cross-chain applications, reliable infrastructure backed by enterprise-grade slas, global node distribution ensures low latency worldwide. On the flip side, Axiom's weaknesses include complex interface has a steeper learning curve for beginners, while QuickNode's main drawback is solana-specific features are less comprehensive than helius.
While Axiom (Trading Bots) and QuickNode (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Axiom has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Axiom is free to start and QuickNode is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.