Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 10, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (6) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
AYZO AYZO is a multichain on-chain research platform for investigating wallet activity, token holders, and funding sources across 15+ networks including Solana, Ethereum, Base, and Bitcoin, with no wallet... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 6 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for AYZO (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
AYZO uses a freemium model, while GetBlock is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
AYZO offers 5 features including 15+ blockchain coverage including Solana, Ethereum, Base, and Bitcoin, Holder-concentration analysis with coverage transparency, Wallet-connection tracking via observed transactions, and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. AYZO currently has a unknown health status. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
AYZO's key strengths include conservative, evidence-based reporting instead of unproven ownership claims, coverage limitations stay attached to every finding, free tier available with no signup friction (3 analyses/24h). GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, AYZO's weaknesses include solana is one of 15+ chains, not the primary focus, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare AYZO with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 8 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 23,516 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | RPC Providers |
| Description | Evidence-first wallet and token intelligence across 15+ chains, including Solana | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While AYZO (Security & Audit) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — AYZO is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.