Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Beosin Beosin is a Web3 security provider offering smart contract auditing, on-chain monitoring, and vulnerability scanning, with support for Solana programs. It spans both pre-deployment audits and post-dep... Quantstamp Quantstamp is a leading blockchain security firm providing smart contract audits, security assessments, and formal verification for Solana programs and dApps. Having audited over 750 projects securing...
Both Beosin and Quantstamp hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Beosin uses a paid model, while Quantstamp is paid.
Beosin offers 5 features including Smart contract auditing for Solana programs, On-chain monitoring and real-time threat alerts, Automated vulnerability scanning, and 2 more. Quantstamp counters with 6 features including Solana smart contract security audits, Rust and Anchor program analysis, Formal verification services, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Beosin currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Quantstamp is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Beosin's key strengths include covers the full security lifecycle, not just audits, combines manual review with automated analysis, real-time monitoring catches post-launch threats. Quantstamp stands out for industry-leading security reputation, deep expertise in solana and rust programs, extensive track record with major protocols. On the flip side, Beosin's weaknesses include b2b security service, not an end-user tool, while Quantstamp's main drawback is premium pricing for audit services.
More comparisons
Compare Beosin with…
Compare Quantstamp with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 30,970 | 78,672 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Smart contract security auditing and on-chain monitoring | Blockchain security audits for Solana programs and dApps |
Both Beosin and Quantstamp operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Beosin's pricing and check Quantstamp's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.