Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Beosin Beosin is a Web3 security provider offering smart contract auditing, on-chain monitoring, and vulnerability scanning, with support for Solana programs. It spans both pre-deployment audits and post-dep... Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge...
Range is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Beosin (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Beosin uses a paid model, while Range is paid.
Beosin offers 5 features including Smart contract auditing for Solana programs, On-chain monitoring and real-time threat alerts, Automated vulnerability scanning, and 2 more. Range counters with 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Beosin currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Range is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Beosin's key strengths include covers the full security lifecycle, not just audits, combines manual review with automated analysis, real-time monitoring catches post-launch threats. Range stands out for promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. On the flip side, Beosin's weaknesses include b2b security service, not an end-user tool, while Range's main drawback is aimed at protocols and operators, not end users.
More comparisons
Compare Beosin with…
Compare Range with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 30,970 | 60 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Smart contract security auditing and on-chain monitoring | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols |
Both Beosin and Range operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Range has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Beosin's pricing and check Range's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.