Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Beosin Beosin is a Web3 security provider offering smart contract auditing, on-chain monitoring, and vulnerability scanning, with support for Solana programs. It spans both pre-deployment audits and post-dep... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Both Beosin and Reclaim Protocol hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Beosin uses a paid model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium.
Beosin offers 5 features including Smart contract auditing for Solana programs, On-chain monitoring and real-time threat alerts, Automated vulnerability scanning, and 2 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Beosin currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Beosin's key strengths include covers the full security lifecycle, not just audits, combines manual review with automated analysis, real-time monitoring catches post-launch threats. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders. On the flip side, Beosin's weaknesses include b2b security service, not an end-user tool, while Reclaim Protocol's main drawback is proofs depend on the structure and availability of source websites.
More comparisons
Compare Beosin with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 31,694 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Smart contract security auditing and on-chain monitoring | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Beosin and Reclaim Protocol operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Beosin's pricing and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.